View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JasonTheGreater Trick Member
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
|
120. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cyberst0rm wrote: | I suck at life and nobody likes me |
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Synaesthesia Trick Member
Joined: 03 Apr 2005 Location: Crushing all deceivers, smashing non-believers |
121. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am going to display the entire course of events of this whole thing, so you can see what you are ACTUALLY arguing, Cyberst0rm. I do believe you have lost sight of your main point, and are now trying to argue semantics. But I could be wrong, so let's review.
1. On page 2, post 39, "Tyrgannus" posts that Kevbo and LilQ have triple-starred Summer ~Speedy Mix~ Expert, and that this is impressive.
2. On page 3, post 43, you post a refutation to "Tyrgannus'" claim, saying that a triple star (with the bar) is unimpressive.
3. On page 4, post 61, "Baggage" asks if you can get remotely close to a triple star no-bar on Summer ~Speedy Mix~ Expert. He tells you to shut up, that "a *** on a 13 is damn amazing, bar or not."
4. On page 5, post 81, you quote "Baggage's" above post, showing you are referencing his specific claim regarding Summer. You say "I played it once an got an S+, so i think you should shut the hell up."
5. On page 5, posts 82, 85-87, the various posters (myself included) do not believe you legitimately got an S+ on Summer ~Speedy Mix~ Expert.
6. On page 5, post 92, in response to "stefank687," you insinuate that it is possible your S+ (94%) on Summer was achieved with the bar.
7. On page 5, post 93, "Kiba" (aka "Soren Kierkegaard") asks how the fact that you supposedly sightread Summer ~Speedy Mix~ Expert and achieved a 94% bears any relevance to you playing well without the bar.
8. On page 5, post 97, you quote the same quote from "stefank687" as you did in Item #6. "Stefank687" claims you cannot sightread Summer ~Speedy Mix~ and get an S+ (94%). You claim that your scores are better on songs with a lot of steam. You suggest that songs like Energizer Hard, Pandemonium Hard, and Summer ~Speedy Mix~ Expert fall into such a category, and as such, you can score well on them. As your offered proof, you provide 2 screencaptures, one of a 96.23% on Energizer Hard, and one of a 90.55% on Wanna Do Expert. You did not state whether you scored these bar or no-bar (as there is some doubt stemming from Item #6.
9. On pages 5-6, posts 98-101 express general disbelief in what you have said up until this point.
10. On page 6, post 103, you refute Item #9, saying that you scores are machine validated. In the second paragraph you post, and I quote, Quote: | "BTW just in case you misread, I did say pandemoium HARD. Maybe you should read a little more carefully, instead of skimming through and misinterpreting things for the sake of making my argument look like bs. Getting a 94 on pandemonium hard is not very impressive, at least not around here." | Summarized, you claim that the grade mentioned in Items #4-8 does not refer to a 94% on Summer ~Speedy Mix~ Expert, but to Pandemonium Hard, mentioned in Item #8.
11. On page 6, posts 103 and 104, "Kiba" and myself, respectively, point out the inconsistency about the songs to which your alleged scores are referring brought about in Item #10. Kiba points out that if your score on Pandemonium Hard (an 11) is 94%, it bears no relevance to a 99+% on Summer ~Speedy Mix~ Expert (a 13).
12. On page 6, post 105, "Kiba" challenges you to point out where you said the word "hard" (citing difficulty). Taken in the context of Item #11, "Kiba" wants for you to point out where you said your 94% was on Pandemonium Hard in Items #4-8, prior to the inconsistency brought about in Item #10.
13. On page 6, post 107, you cite your own post said to be located on page 5 (which undoubtedly refers to post 97 as per Item #8) in response to Kiba's request to show where you mentioned "hard," in association with Pandemonium Hard.
14. On page 6, post 108, you quote my post regarding antecedent referral with respect to Summer ~Speedy Mix~. Contrary to Item #10, you claim that that which I referenced in my post from Item #11, WAS Summer ~Speedy Mix~, and NOT Pandemonium Hard.
15. On page 6, post 110, "Kiba" challenges you to show him a quote from you saying, and I quote, "FIND ME A QUOTE OF YOU SAYING THAT YOUR S+ WAS ON PANDEMONIUM HARD."
16. On page 6, post 111, I point out the inconsistency of Items #10 and 14.
17. On page 6, posts 115-116, you reference Item #8 in response to "Kiba's" challenge of Item #15. You prove that you have mentioned Pandemonium Hard at least once, but does not fulfill "Kiba's" request in Item #15, as it mentions nothing of your score. _________________
im a lasagna whale
G_G |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Synaesthesia Trick Member
Joined: 03 Apr 2005 Location: Crushing all deceivers, smashing non-believers |
122. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
So let's take a look a look at what that course of events all means. At first you start to say a *** on a 13 (Summer) is unimpressive to you. That's perfectly fine, some people are hard to please. The problem arises when you tell Baggage you got 94% on Summer. No one believes it, and later (#6) you imply you got it with the bar. When you're arguing that a *** on Summer with bar isn't impressive, how does saying you got a 94% on that very song with the bar support your argument at all? In #10 you waffle on your claim that you 94% was on Summer, and say it was Pandy Hard. This is clearly contradictory to everything you had seen up until that point. ALL you had done was try to lump a 10, an 11, and a 13 in the same group, validate the set with a picture of a * on Engergizer Hard, and go on your merry way. Sorry, it doesn't work like that. In DDR, I can't take my scores on Senorita Speedy or Twinbee and say "look they all have stream. I'm good at stream, and so Max 300 is a breeze." In #11, Kiba says that even if have 94% on BOTH Summer Expert and Pandy Hard, your latter score bears no relevance to the significance of someone ***ing a 13. Then, in #14, you change your position AGAIN. You tell me you DID get a 94% on Summer Expert, contradicting yourself again as you had told everyone in #10 that your score was for Pandy Hard, not Summer Expert. After this, you choose to ignore half of Kiba's request and just point out that you had mentioned the words "pandemonium" and "hard" in succession with each other before, irrespective of grades. Of course, as per your Groovestats that I had linked in post 111, you have NO confirmed scores for Pandy or Summer on any difficulty level, so that too lends no credence to you arguments. So now you are arguing with Kiba over whether or not you said "hard" and are ignoring the 2 prominent inconsistencies that have arisen over the course of this thread. _________________
im a lasagna whale
G_G |
|
Back to top |
|
|
J. S. Mill Maniac Member
Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Location: New York, New York |
123. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well guys, this was really fun, but I guess this isn't supposed to happen. I tried to bury this thread with argument (thanks for helping Syn) but I guess it didn't work so I'll warn people now (including myself in all likelihood). Let's begin:
Cyberst0rm wrote: | I played it once an got an S+, so i think you should shut the hell up. |
Cyberst0rm wrote: | guys stefank687 said its not impressive so now its a fact. Got it? Bar rapping is not impressive. |
Both of these are obviously flamebaiting (as they proved by derailing the thread instantly). Two points.
Asymptote wrote: | dude, youre such a painful liar |
This is a response and you gave a reason for it. No points. Same go for the next two posts, and later for my rhetorical post.
Cyberst0rm wrote: | hey dumbass, when did i say those were my best scores? If i tried a little harder WITHOUT a bar i could probably do a little better, but not much. WITH A BAR, I S+ summer, once. I haven't played for abobut 3 months, so now, i don't even know if i'd pass it. But once again, I never said I did summer WITHOUT a bar. Way to go. |
Flaming, although you were responding. One point. Also flamebaiting, since you knew that would provoke a reply. Again, almost in response (although you provoked the reply). One point.
Cyberst0rm wrote: | How the frick do you know what I can and can't do? Who the frick are you? You say it as if you know me, but you don't have a clue. So just shut up. |
This is flaming. One point.
stefank687 wrote: | Cyberst0rm wrote: | all of cyberstorm's BS |
This guy is retarded and im not just being an idiot right? |
This is flamebaiting. Two points.
Søren Kierkegaard wrote: | Quoted, so you can't change it later like a coward. Put your money where your mouth is and show me what we "should have read a little more carefully." |
Søren Kierkegaard wrote: | Kind of like you making up fake scores to validate your position and posting them in a misleading way then trying to take them back because you are so hypocritical that you can't even face your own dishonesty? |
Both are flamebaiting. I might consider this provoked normally, but I'm a moderator and held to a higher standard. Therefore, I warn myself two points.
JasonTheGreater wrote: | Cyberst0rm wrote: | HAY GUYS IM A DOUCHEBAG |
|
Provoked, and kind of an opinion. One point for all instances of this kind of response.
stefank687 wrote: | Or you could be an annoying, retarded kid that no one really likes(you set your dumbass up for that one) |
Flaming. Two points.
Cyberst0rm wrote: | Because you have to be the most ignorant retard this world has to offer |
Definitely flaming, possibly provoked. Two points.
Cyberst0rm wrote: | I've come to the conclusion that all of you are retarded, or can't read. Most likely both. |
Flaming, two points.
Alright, there we go. Feel fre to continue posting on this thread, but I will warn any further mention of this engagement (although, honestly, it was very fun). If you have a disagreement about your warning, PM me and we will discuss it. I commute warnings frequently (lower them) with a good argument. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
emibeatheboss Basic Member
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
|
124. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, due to this thread having been brought to my attention, I would like to put a few words into it before it dies. (Which I believe is way overdue.)
To address what seemed to have been brought up extensively throughout this thread; The bar used in ITG does not require any real 'skill' at all. Playing the game, the movement of your body, the momentum and rythmn in which you move, the synchronization that goes into playing, along with many other factors is where the real skill lies. I have a pet peeve with people who believe grasping the bar has any other purpose other than for support. As many of you, I should hope know, there are many ITG tournaments that ban the bar in order for the players real skill to be brought to light. The bar is merely in place to allow for support for extremely difficult songs that force your body to move into positions that are more difficult to recover from when moving at such high speeds. When you hold to the bar it allows for you to use your arms to support your body, (which I will DEFINTIELY give you, takes a lot of strength) thus taking your weight from your feet allowing them to move faster. If you believe that holding your body up is a skill. Then in your opinion you are using a skill. But it is definitely possible to play these songs without a bar. Which is incredibly impressively considering I can't do it, but I 've seen it been done.
I just had to get that in here... since it is a major pet peeve. But other than that, I just have a criticism of this entire thread.
Grow Up.
You all establish your ethos for what? What are you really trying prove? Congratulations, your superior, now do you honestly feel superior? Not only do you do this but decide to create what can only be described as a 'gang up' against one player for him only expressing his opinion. I can side with neither considering what went on here, but I will have to express a great inadequacy and biased in the moderator. Sure you cannot control what people post and say, but order and the establishment of such is called for. This thread should have been cut long before it reached this. I almost feel it fitting to put here a quote from antigone but considering the intellectual capacity of most of the posters here, (as been demonstrated throughout this thread, and is not baseless) I feel the comprehension of such a quote would certainly surpass many. (This obviously not including Soren Kierkegaard, who told us his life story that blantantly proves that he is quite the intellectual.)
I must say the moderator should have stepped it up on 'certain' comments made throughout this thread. Such that are baseless and just plain immature. Considering they add no substance to the thread or any anything other than just a great annoyance.
Where cyberst0rm posted his 'flaming' comments, he got two points.
understandable....yet biased when it came to the others.
Such as the mocking by a JasonTheGreater who only got one point for his incredibly blantant 'flaming' comment.
Interesting.
'One point for all instances of this kind of response.'
Then should not have all the others who were expressing their 'opinions' but obviously flaming recieve the one point?
Well, I'm done, I've said my piece. I apologize to anyone if you were offended by this; but I'm not sorry if you were one of those who deserved it.
*Edited after a misspelling*[/i] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JasonTheGreater Trick Member
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
|
125. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
emibeatheboss wrote: | blah blah blah blah blah |
By the way, unlike DDR, ITG was designed to be used in conjunction with the bar.
emibeatheboss wrote: | *Edited after a misspelling* |
Actually you missed quite a few misspellings:
emibeatheboss wrote: | Well, due to this thread having been brought to my attention, I would like to put a few words into it before it dies. (Which I believe is way overdue.)
To address what seemed to have been brought up extensively throughout this thread; The bar used in ITG does not require any real 'skill' at all. Playing the game, the movement of your body, the momentum and rythmn in which you move, the synchronization that goes into playing, along with many other factors is where the real skill lies. I have a pet peeve with people who believe grasping the bar has any other purpose other than for support. As many of you, I should hope know, there are many ITG tournaments that ban the bar in order for the players real skill to be brought to light. The bar is merely in place to allow for support for extremely difficult songs that force your body to move into positions that are more difficult to recover from when moving at such high speeds. When you hold to the bar it allows for you to use your arms to support your body, (which I will DEFINTIELY give you, takes a lot of strength) thus taking your weight from your feet allowing them to move faster. If you believe that holding your body up is a skill. Then in your opinion you are using a skill. But it is definitely possible to play these songs without a bar. Which is incredibly impressively considering I can't do it, but I 've seen it been done.
I just had to get that in here... since it is a major pet peeve. But other than that, I just have a criticism of this entire thread.
Grow Up.
You all establish your ethos for what? What are you really trying prove? Congratulations, your superior, now do you honestly feel superior? Not only do you do this but decide to create what can only be described as a 'gang up' against one player for him only expressing his opinion. I can side with neither considering what went on here, but I will have to express a great inadequacy and biased in the moderator. Sure you cannot control what people post and say, but order and the establishment of such is called for. This thread should have been cut long before it reached this. I almost feel it fitting to put here a quote from antigone but considering the intellectual capacity of most of the posters here, (as been demonstrated throughout this thread, and is not baseless) I feel the comprehension of such a quote would certainly surpass many. (This obviously not including Soren Kierkegaard, who told us his life story that blantantly proves that he is quite the intellectual.)
I must say the moderator should have stepped it up on 'certain' comments made throughout this thread. Such that are baseless and just plain immature. Considering they add no substance to the thread or any anything other than just a great annoyance.
Where cyberst0rm posted his 'flaming' comments, he got two points.
understandable....yet biased when it came to the others.
Such as the mocking by a JasonTheGreater who only got one point for his incredibly blantant 'flaming' comment.
Interesting.
'One point for all instances of this kind of response.'
Then should not have all the others who were expressing their 'opinions' but obviously flaming recieve the one point?
Well, I'm done, I've said my piece. I apologize to anyone if you were offended by this; but I'm not sorry if you were one of those who deserved it.
*Edited after a misspelling* |
Misspellings are a major pet peeve of mine. Don't even get me started on your horrible grammar. I probably missed a lot more spelling mistakes, but I only scanned it. _________________
Last edited by JasonTheGreater on Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:35 pm, edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rancidfish Trick Member
Joined: 29 Jun 2002 Location: Santa Rosa, CA/Santa Cruz, CA |
126. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
emibeatheboss wrote: | The bar used in ITG does not require any real 'skill' at all. Playing the game, the movement of your body, the momentum and rythmn in which you move, the synchronization that goes into playing, along with many other factors is where the real skill lies. I have a pet peeve with people who believe grasping the bar has any other purpose other than for support. As many of you, I should hope know, there are many ITG tournaments that ban the bar in order for the players real skill to be brought to light. | This thread is probably done, but this sort of logic confuses me.
You say that the skill of playing the game is in the movement of your body, the rhythm and synchronization of scoring well, and so on. I completely agree with this. Then you go on to say that tournaments ban the bar so that players' "real skill" can be "brought to light."
The skills that you mentioned are how you move your body and time your steps. These have nothing to do with what the bar affects, how you support your weight. How, then, does playing no-bar bring a player's "real" skill to light? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Synaesthesia Trick Member
Joined: 03 Apr 2005 Location: Crushing all deceivers, smashing non-believers |
127. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To sort of contribute, I passed Clockwok Engines the other day with a frighteningly low score. Trying to condense a week's worth of not playing into one weekend trip is hard. :\ _________________
im a lasagna whale
G_G |
|
Back to top |
|
|
In The Navy Trick Member
Joined: 21 Oct 2005
|
128. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Søren Kierkegaard wrote: |
When I was twelve I took the SAT with no study. I got 1590.
|
olol cant get 1590 on sats
>.> 7x.xx'd Utopia barless, 6x.xx'd Utopia barless x1.
No pictures, but I'll take a screenshot on SM or something. _________________
[quote:64a2055144="ThePandemonium"]Eather RoXor has some really stupid people or they are made up of many 1st graders. We love your math skills RoXor! Go take 2nd grade again...[/quote]
XDDDD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Subrosian Trick Member
Joined: 24 Jan 2004
|
129. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What the heck at the offtopicness =|
I almost passed Summer Ex no-bar the other day but I had to grab the bar for about 6 seconds near the end. Finished with something like 84-85% bugged, probably 80ish unbugged or so. I'll try to get it no-bar another day when I'm prepared. I just got too tired near the end and thought I was gonna fail, so I used it =\ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JasonTheGreater Trick Member
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
|
130. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In The Navy wrote: | Søren Kierkegaard wrote: |
When I was twelve I took the SAT with no study. I got 1590.
|
olol cant get 1590 on sats |
Yeah you can. Unless you mean you specifically can't get a 1590 on them because you're not smart enough or something. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
emibeatheboss Basic Member
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
|
131. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm very sorry I annoyed you with my spelling Jason. Funny that's basically all you mentioned about my post. GREAT addition to this topic, nice job derailing.
ANYWAYS;
Quote: | Then you go on to say that tournaments ban the bar so that players' "real skill" can be "brought to light."
The skills that you mentioned are how you move your body and time your steps. These have nothing to do with what the bar affects, how you support your weight. How, then, does playing no-bar bring a player's "real" skill to light? |
well, a lot of people use the bar for support for those tougher songs. The bar assists in keeping the body steady during the twists and difficult manuevers. Thus without the bar, you have to rely on the skill in which you develop on how to move your body and to make quick recoveries from those difficult twists and such. These 'real' skills are what I'm talking about. The ones developed by playing and relying only on yourself to score.
I'm not condemning those who use the bar in the least. I just want to put it out there. I am highly impressed by people who play ITG with/without the bar and are able to pass songs that I can't. Props to you. I'm not saying you don't use any skill when using the bar, just it's not in the bar holding. It's in yourself.
[/quote] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JasonTheGreater Trick Member
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
|
132. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
emibeatheboss wrote: | I'm very sorry I annoyed you with my spelling Jason. Funny that's basically all you mentioned about my post. GREAT addition to this topic, nice job derailing. |
Your post stated that you have a peeve again people that use the bar for anything other than support.
My post replies that I have a peeve against people that spell horribly and expect to be taken seriously.
I don't really see how that's derailing, but if you can explain it in a way that's not riddled with grammatical inconsistencies and illogical misspellings, I'd be glad to hear it.
If you payed attention, you would see that before I went about correcting some of your horrid spelling, I replied that ITG, unlike DDR, was designed specifically with the notion that in order for people to excel at this game, they would have to use the bar.
All things aside though, apology accepted. Not many people are smart enough to apologize to someone obviously superior to them, but you're one of the few exceptions. Good job. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Synaesthesia Trick Member
Joined: 03 Apr 2005 Location: Crushing all deceivers, smashing non-believers |
133. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JasonTheGreater wrote: | In The Navy wrote: | Søren Kierkegaard wrote: |
When I was twelve I took the SAT with no study. I got 1590.
|
olol cant get 1590 on sats |
Yeah you can. Unless you mean you specifically can't get a 1590 on them because you're not smart enough or something. |
Actually 1590 would really suck nowadays. _________________
im a lasagna whale
G_G |
|
Back to top |
|
|
J. S. Mill Maniac Member
Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Location: New York, New York |
134. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
emibeatheboss wrote: | As many of you, I should hope know, there are many ITG tournaments that ban the bar in order for the players real skill to be brought to light. |
I'm sorry, I don't know this. Could you give me the name of a major tournament which banned the bar for this reason? This was not the reason the WC banned the bar.
emibeatheboss wrote: | But it is definitely possible to play these songs without a bar. |
It isn't, not for some of us (myself included).
emibeatheboss wrote: | ribed as a 'gang up' against one player for him only expressing his opinion. |
It was not expressing his opinion that angered people.
emibeatheboss wrote: | but I will have to express a great inadequacy and biased in the moderator. |
I'm sorry you feel that way, I took great pains to try to moderate fairly. Do you have a specific complaint? Please note that not only did I warn equally on both sides, but I also warned myself.
emibeatheboss wrote: | This thread should have been cut long before it reached this. |
That's a fair comment.
emibeatheboss wrote: | I almost feel it fitting to put here a quote from antigone but considering the intellectual capacity of most of the posters here, (as been demonstrated throughout this thread, and is not baseless) I feel the comprehension of such a quote would certainly surpass many. |
Feel free to post your quote, but this is in fact flamebaiting. I will not warn you because it is your first post on this topic, but especially right after all that, please do not do that.
emibeatheboss wrote: | (This obviously not including Soren Kierkegaard, who told us his life story that blantantly proves that he is quite the intellectual.) |
To be perfectly correct, I proved only that I was not retarded. I responded to a specific insult by demonstrating the counterpositive, do you have a problem with this?
emibeatheboss wrote: | I must say the moderator should have stepped it up on 'certain' comments made throughout this thread. |
I gave over fifteen warning points for this thread. Some to myself.
emibeatheboss wrote: | Such that are baseless and just plain immature. Considering they add no substance to the thread or any anything other than just a great annoyance. |
Yes, hence the post above yours.
emibeatheboss wrote: | Where cyberst0rm posted his 'flaming' comments, he got two points.
understandable....yet biased when it came to the others. |
Where?
emibeatheboss wrote: | Such as the mocking by a JasonTheGreater who only got one point for his incredibly blantant 'flaming' comment. |
Would you like the reasoning? Jason replied to flaming, hence my useage of the word provoked. You'll notice I didn't warn all of Cyberstorms warnable statements as well. Moreover, Jason expressed an opinion and attempted to use humor to belay a worse situation. He is guilty of breaking the rules with his two posts, but as neither caused any response, I feel the warning was appropriate. Do you disagree?
emibeatheboss wrote: | 'One point for all instances of this kind of response.' |
Ah, forgive me if that was not clear. Jason made that same post, in two different forms, twice. I gave him one point for both, that is what that sentence meant.
emibeatheboss wrote: | Then should not have all the others who were expressing their 'opinions' but obviously flaming recieve the one point? |
No, it depends on the circumstances.
emibeatheboss wrote: | Well, I'm done, I've said my piece. I apologize to anyone if you were offended by this; but I'm not sorry if you were one of those who deserved it. |
You have the right to express your opinion, although PMing me may have been more appropriate. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rancidfish Trick Member
Joined: 29 Jun 2002 Location: Santa Rosa, CA/Santa Cruz, CA |
135. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Synaesthesia wrote: | Actually 1590 would really suck nowadays. | SAT I? It's Verbal and Math, two tests which are graded out of 800. 1590 is therefore 10 away from a 1600, which is a perfect score, so...
...how exactly does a 1590 suck nowadays? Are you perhaps thinking of the SAT IIs, which are three tests? emibeatheboss wrote: | well, a lot of people use the bar for support for those tougher songs. The bar assists in keeping the body steady during the twists and difficult manuevers. Thus without the bar, you have to rely on the skill in which you develop on how to move your body and to make quick recoveries from those difficult twists and such. These 'real' skills are what I'm talking about. The ones developed by playing and relying only on yourself to score.
I'm not condemning those who use the bar in the least. I just want to put it out there. I am highly impressed by people who play ITG with/without the bar and are able to pass songs that I can't. Props to you. I'm not saying you don't use any skill when using the bar, just it's not in the bar holding. It's in yourself. | so now you're saying, the skill you're using when you're playing with the bar is real skill, and yet you're saying that you're referring to the "real" skills that you use when you're not using the bar. These are different, somehow? One is more real than the other? Or perhaps more skills are associated with one than the other? _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Synaesthesia Trick Member
Joined: 03 Apr 2005 Location: Crushing all deceivers, smashing non-believers |
136. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rancidfish wrote: | Synaesthesia wrote: | Actually 1590 would really suck nowadays. | SAT I? It's Verbal and Math, two tests which are graded out of 800. 1590 is therefore 10 away from a 1600, which is a perfect score, so...
...how exactly does a 1590 suck nowadays? Are you perhaps thinking of the SAT IIs, which are three tests? |
Because now it goes to 2400. _________________
im a lasagna whale
G_G |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IHYD.Blake Vivid Member
Joined: 14 Aug 2004 Location: Solar City, California |
137. Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It most likely didnt go to 2400 back then.
Almost on topic: I think that the bar really doesnt make any of a difference. If you can pass a song with the bar, you could probably do it without the bar also, unless your pass with it is like a C or below. (Thats my situation, haha)
The bar doesnt affect much on FA. If you can 99 or even 100 a song with the bar, you probably wouldnt do much worse without it. All the bar really helps with is making it so you dont get as tired, and, I donno, thats about it. Thats like running with 30 pound ankle weights. Is it against the rules to run without it, because it makes you better?
In conclusion, who cares how you play an arcade game? If you do, then you should seriously look into sorting out your priorities.
On topic: I got a 99.49 on My Favourite Game expert no bar. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mostly_Harmless Trick Member
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Location: Cranford New Jersey |
138. Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | On topic: I got a 99.49 on My Favourite Game expert no bar.
|
thats insain. How can you move your feet so fast? I can only imagine anywhere from half to a quater of your foor leaving the center of the pad to hit the arrows. Is that how experts move there feet because i tend to put my whole foot on the arrow, I guess that would take more time am I right? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boochypa Trick Member
Joined: 26 Nov 2003 Location: VA Tech |
139. Posted: Thu Mar 23, 2006 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
MFG is a really fast song, guys. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|